FBME Bank Ltd v Dangate Consulting Ltd [2018] EWHC 546 (Comm)

Defendants’ unsuccessful application for an order that the Second and Third Claimants’ solicitors cease acting due to an alleged conflict with the First Claimant.  Unless the Court is given cogent evidence of a conflict, it should and does trust solicitors to police their own professional obligations. In any event, the Court does not have the means to look into privileged communications as the SRA would do if, after a full trial, the trial judge thought that there was something meriting the regulator’s attention. If any conflict did arise, though one was not found, on the facts it would have been historic, because the solicitors were no longer acting for the First Claimant.

Note: the Court of Appeal decision in Hood Sailmakers Ltd v The Berthon Boat Company Ltd (Independent, May 10, 1999) was not cited. See link here.

‹ Back to News
  • Legal Risk Publication

    Risk Update • January 2020

    Read More
  • Legal Risk Publication

    Legal Compliance January 2020 – Reaching for the STARs

    Read More
  • Legal Risk Publication

    Risk Update • November 2019

    Read More
  • Legal Risk Publication

    Risk Update • January 2020

    Read More
  • Legal Risk Publication

    Legal Compliance January 2020 - Reaching for the STARs

    Read More
  • Legal Risk Publication

    Risk Update • November 2019

    Read More