Plein v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company, 2019 WL 3407107
Related News
- New York Bar Formal Opinion 2024-1: Ethical Issues Arising from the Representation of Two or More Bidders Competing for the Same Asset
- Law Society Practice note – Conflict of interests (updated 27 July 2023)
- DC Bar – Ethics Opinion 383 – Disclosure of Client Confidences or Secrets in Compliance With the Outside Counsel Guidelines of Another Client; Advance Agreement to Withdraw from Representation in the Event of a “Midstream” Conflict
- Revolaze, L.L.C. v. Dentons US L.L.P., 2022-Ohio-1392
- Law Society Practice Note on Conflict of Interests – updated
- Al-Subaihi & Anor v Al-Sanea [2021] EWHC 2609 (Comm)
Plein v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company, 2019 WL 3407107
‘Playbook conflicts’ arise when a lawyer has knowledge of a client’s approach to strategy: is that alone confidential information on the same or a related matter, such as to prevent the lawyer acting against the client? This was a decision of the Washington State (USA) Court of Appeals on the meaning of ‘substantially related’ in relation to a former client conflict, based on the ‘legal strategies and defenses developed between USAA’ and the law firm in many previous cases. The court, reversing the lower court, disqualified the lawyers from acting.
See here.
‹ Back to News