Tripipatkul v WH Lawrence Ltd (t/a WH Lawrence Solicitors) [2021] EWHC B13 (Costs)
Related News
- ABA Formal Opinion 510, Avoiding the Imputation of a Conflict of Interest When a Law Firm is Adverse to One of its Lawyer’s Prospective Clients
- Irwin Mitchell Trust Corporation v PW & Anor [2024] EWCOP 16
- New York Bar Formal Opinion 2024-1: Ethical Issues Arising from the Representation of Two or More Bidders Competing for the Same Asset
- Law Society Practice note – Conflict of interests (updated 27 July 2023)
- DC Bar – Ethics Opinion 383 – Disclosure of Client Confidences or Secrets in Compliance With the Outside Counsel Guidelines of Another Client; Advance Agreement to Withdraw from Representation in the Event of a “Midstream” Conflict
- Revolaze, L.L.C. v. Dentons US L.L.P., 2022-Ohio-1392
Tripipatkul v WH Lawrence Ltd (t/a WH Lawrence Solicitors) [2021] EWHC B13 (Costs)
Decision setting aside a contentious business agreement, on the basis that its terms were unreasonable, under section 61 of the Solicitors Act 1974, a provision on which there is little authority.
See here.
‹ Back to News