EWCA Civ 1492
Appeal dismissed against finding that a Nigerian bank was not liable for knowing/dishonest assistance in breach of trust. The manager had suspected in a general way that the parties might be involved in money laundering, but did not have suspicions about the two transactions which gave rise to the claim.
 EWCA Crim 146
The offence of money laundering under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 s.328(1) would only be committed where the property in question was "criminal property" at the time of the relevant arrangement; the appellant, who had knowingly submitting false mortgage applications on behalf of third parties, was not guilty of the offence, because when he entered into the relevant arrangements with the mortgage brokers the property in question was not criminal in the hands of the mortgage company.
 EWCA Crim 87
The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) quashed three convictions on the grounds that the prosecution had to prove that the defendants knew, and did not just suspect, that the cash was the proceeds of crime. The prosecution had alleged in substance that the conspirators had concealed, disguised or removed from the jurisdiction bank notes knowing or having reasonable grounds to suspect that in whole or in part they represented another person's proceeds of drug trafficking.
They extend the application of the legislation to electronic money, and to overseas trustees.
 EWHC 162 (QB)
The first final decision on a contested application by the Assets Recovery Agency for a Recovery Order, based on allegations of mortgage fraud, conspiracies to defraud and money laundering. The court dismissed an argument that no property was obtained from alleged mortgage fraud based on R v Preddy  AC 815.
 EWCA Civ 104
Court of Appeal judgment
 EWCA Civ 1007
A solicitors who failed to heed the Law Society’s Blue Card warning on money laundering was foolish but not dishonest. Appeal allowed.
 EWCA Civ 1474
2015 SCC 7
The Supreme Court of Canada has held that money laundering laws are unconstitutional in so far as they apply to lawyers, holding that legal professional privilege is near-absolute and that a lawyer’s duty of commitment to the client’s cause is a “principle of fundamental justice”. ‘Clients are not, however, entitled to make unwitting accomplices of their lawyers let alone enlist them in the service of their unlawful ends.’
The report contains information on pandemic-related typologies and notes that most countries reported that due to pandemic and remote working FI and DNFBP supervisors experienced challenges in conducting on-site supervisions. Onsite controls have been postposed, the authorities favouring off-site and desk-based reviews. The supervisors’ efforts have been placed in ensuring that the off-site supervisory activities are maintained and, when possible, reinforced.
For sensitive information, such as client file reviews, the authorities have opted to either receive client files through a secure cloud portal or other electronic means or reviewing these documents remotely e.g. through the shared screen facility offered by video conferencing.
 EWCA Crim 229
Profits made from trading in legitimate goods were not necessarily converted into criminal property by a failure to declare them to the Inland Revenue or the Department of Work and Pensions. The failure to declare the profits for the purposes of income tax could give rise to a criminal offence but it did not make the trading itself an offence.
|2011| UKSC 49
Supreme Court held that the application of civil standard of proof in civil recovery proceedings did not breach Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights .
 EWCA Crim 1925
The Court of Appeal quashed the defendant’s conviction for money laundering under section 328 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002: ‘In our view the natural and ordinary meaning of section 328(1) is that the arrangement to which it refers must be one which relates to property which is criminal property at the time when the arrangement begins to operate on it. To say that it extends to property which was originally legitimate but became criminal only as a result of carrying out the arrangement is to stretch the language of the section beyond its proper limits. An arrangement relating to property which has an independent criminal object may, when carried out, render the subject matter criminal property, but it cannot properly be said that the arrangement applied to property that was already criminal property at the time it began to operate on it.’ (Paragraph 19). Practitioners will therefore need to consider carefully whether the circumstances they are considering involve laundering of the proceeds of crime, or merely the initial crime itself.
 UKSC 24
The Supreme Court distinguished R v Geary  1 WLR 1634, CA. The defendant opened bank accounts and provided the documentation to a fraudster who operated bogus car insurance websites. The victims’ money was paid into the accounts. There was no criminal property at the time the defendant entered into the arrangement with the fraudster, but an offence was committed contrary to section 328 of the Proceeds of Crime Act (arrangements) at the later time when the proceeds of the fraud were paid into the account and the money laundering arrangement came into operation.
 EWCA Crim 1248
Where one defendant receives money or other property jointly on behalf of several other defendants each defendant is regarded as having received the whole of it for the purposes of confiscation proceedings. It does not matter if one defendant had received the whole sum, retained his 'share' and passed the balance on. The capacity in which he received it is the test
 EWCA Crim 2155
Appeal against sentence by solicitor convicted of failing to make a required disclosure contrary to section 330(1) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. The jury’s verdict demonstrated that the solicitor did not have knowledge of money laundering but that reasonable grounds existed for him knowing or suspecting that others were involved in money laundering. The Court of Appeal concluded with the following warning – ‘We do not leave the case without underlining to all professional people involved in the handling of money and with an involvement in financial transactions the absolute obligation to observe scrupulously the terms of this legislation and the inevitable penalty that will follow failure so to do’.
Unexplained Wealth Order upheld by Court of Appeal.
The court should ignore the total amount of VAT for which the offender had accounted to HMRC when making a confiscation order assessing the amount of benefit obtained by an offender for the purpose of making a confiscation order under s.76(4) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 as to do otherwise would be disproportionate and breach Article 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights.
The Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Amendment) Regulations 2019 require the UK regulated sector to apply enhanced customer due diligence in relation to high-risk countries. HM Treasury draws the regulated sectors’ attention to the latest publication by FATF on high risk jurisdictions.
Updated with information for letting agency businesses, to help them decide if they need to register for money laundering supervision.
 EWHC 978 (Admin) Westlaw subscribers only.
 UKPC 4 Privy Council Appeal No 0046 of 2012
Note that this also addresses data subject access requests under UK GDPR
A bank, suspecting money laundering, was entitled to close the accounts of its customer, a money service business (MSB), without notice. A secondary claim in negligence failed. ‘[The] interests and reputation of N and of the Bank are only part of the picture. The wider, public, interests of the prevention of crime and the protection of the victims of crime are a further crucial part of the picture.
Judgment in failed application to set aside Unexplained Wealth Order. The judgment will be of particular interest to AML compliance practitioners for its analysis of the definition of “state-owned enterprises” in relation to Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs).
Court of Appeal decision reviewing the consent regime under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. The court emphasised that the grant of consent by the National Crime Agency (NCA) does not imply NCA approval of the proposed act, that funds are clean or that no criminality is involved. The NCA stated that ‘in cases of urgency it can and does in appropriate cases move considerably faster than within 7 days and indeed potentially within hours’. In appropriate cases, it is ‘desirable that the need for urgency is communicated to the NCA and that it responds promptly in so far as it can do so’.
The latest UK Government’s national risk assessment was released on 17 December 2020. The risk of money laundering in the legal sector remains high. The assessment notes that the risk of these services being exploited by criminals increases when legal professionals take a tick box approach to compliance. The risk of terrorist financing in the sector is low.
Estate agency and letting services are assessed as medium risk and again the risk of terrorist financing in the sector is low.
 EWCA Crim
This case considers whether the Crown must prove what type of criminal conduct generated the benefit represented by criminal property in money laundering cases.
 EWCA Crim 1680
Where the conduct occurred outside the UK and there was no allegation of money laundering against the defendant there, POCA was sufficiently wide to confer jurisdiction The court considered that ‘the offence of money laundering is par excellence an offence which, in effect, has no national boundaries’. v
 EWCA Crim 97
A Solicitor - an MLRO during the time a client had laundered fraudulently obtained money through the firm's client account - was cleared of six counts of money laundering in January 2010, after a judge ruled that a fair trial was impossible due to delays in bringing the prosecution.
 EWHC 630 (QB)
Estate agents who failed to register under the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 (then with the OFT but it would now be HMRC) were unable to recover their fees as the contract was illegal.
Confidentiality, fraud and anti-money laundering disclosures, public interest and compulsion of law.
At present, this search facility covers Denmark, Germany, Greece, Croatia, Italy, Cyprus, Poland, Slovenia, Sweden and Norway. It will cover more countries and provide more information and documents in due course.
Provides search facilities against bar lists in many European countries.
The largest open database of companies in the world
 EWHC 1283 (QB)
Update: The claim for alleged negligence/breach of contract in reporting of money laundering suspicions failed in the High Court of Justice QBD on 16 May 2012.
 EWCA Civ 31
Court of Appeal decision following claim for failing to carry out customer’s instructions following notification to SOCA struck out; suspicion was a purely subjective matter, and absent any allegation of want of good faith, did not have to be a reasonable one. The Court of Appeal confirmed the test of suspicion as set out in the cases of Da Silva and K Limited - a suspicion does not have to be on reasonable grounds, just that the possibility has to be 'more than fanciful'.
 EWHC 2307 (QB)
A claim by the Serious Organised Crime Agency in which it was held that the court could make a recovery order under Part 5 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 in relation to a false statement in a mortgage application form, albeit this particular application was unsuccessful. The court stressed that this should be more widely known, and that it would be desirable for mortgage providers to spell out in their application forms the possible consequence of a misstatement.
Since 10 January 2020, the definition of a tax adviser under The Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017 changed and become wider in scope. The SRA published guidance on the definition and what firms need to do if they are now in scope of the regulations.
£10,000 fine plus, £10,350 costs for failure to have practice wide risk assessment
 EWHC 2074 (Admin)
For a person to be found guilty of an offence under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 s.328(1), entering into an arrangement which he knew or suspected facilitated the acquisition of criminal property by or on behalf of another person, that other person had to be identified or at least identifiable at the moment of the arrangement. Westlaw subscribers only